|
|
|---|---|
|
Sponsor |
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs. |
|
Mode of Administration |
Interview: With the exception of the first and the fifth of a total of seven interviews, all interviews are done by phone using computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI). The first and fifth interviews are personal interviews using computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI). |
|
Survey Sample Design |
The NCVS uses a stratified, multistage cluster sample. Primary sampling units (PSUs) consist of counties, groups of counties, or large metropolitan areas. The 1994 survey sample households were drawn from the 1980-based sample design. Data are collected every year from a sample of approximately 50,000 households that includes about 100,000 people aged 12 years and older. PSUs remain in the sample for a total of 3 years. A total of seven interviews are conducted at 6-month intervals during the 3-year process. |
|
Response Rates |
Response rates have consistently remained around 95 percent (96 percent of eligible housing units and 92 percent of individuals in interviewed households). |
|
Primary Survey Content |
The NCVS counts incidents not reported to police and is one of two U.S. Department of Justice measures of crime in the United States. The survey contains a screening section with detailed questions and cues on victimizations and situations within which crimes may take place. Interviewers follow up positive responses and collect details about victimizations in incident reports. |
|
Population Targeted |
Noninstitutionalized population aged 12 years and older residing in the United States. |
|
Demographic Data |
Age, gender, race, ethnicity, and income. Property crimes include data on age, race, ethnicity, and household size. |
|
Years Collected |
1974 to present. |
|
Schedule |
Annual. |
|
Geographic Estimates |
National. |
|
Contact Information |
Data system homepage: |
|
References |
Kinderman, C.; Lynch, J.; and Cantor, D. Effects of the Redesign on Victimization Estimates. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1997. Hubble, D. The National Crime Victimization Survey Redesign: New Questionnaire and Procedures Development and Phase-In Methodology. Orlando, FL: Annual meetings of the American Statistical Association, 1995. Persley, C. The National Crime Victimization Survey Redesign: Measuring the Impact of New Methods. Orlando, FL: Annual meetings of the American Statistical Association, 1995. Biderman, A.D.; Cantor, D.; Lynch, J.P.; et al. Final Report of Research and Development for the Redesign of the National Crime Victimization Survey. Washington, DC: Bureau of Social Sciences Research, Inc., 1986. Hubble, D. The National Crime Survey’s New Questionnaire Phase-in: Preliminary Results. Tucson, AZ: International Conference on Measurement Errors in Surveys, 1990. Hubble, D., and Wilder, B.E. Preliminary Results from the National Crime Survey CATI Experience. New Orleans, LA: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association: Survey Methods Section, 1988. |